Wednesday, March 22, 2006
Bush makes false claim about Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda
I know it's hard to believe Mr. President, but they have these things know that actually record what you say and are able to play back what they record. Even after a long period of time. Keith Olbermann and Countdown supply the evidence.Source
Today in his speech in Cleveland:
Bush: "First-just if I might correct a misperception, I don't think we ever said, at least I know I didn't say that there was a direct connection between September 11th and Saddam Hussein."
In days gone by-SOTU-three years ago:
Bush: "Saddam Hussein aids and protects terrorists, including members of al-Qaeda."
Now-anyone listening and watching his speech back then would make that connection easily enough since al-Qaeda was responsible for 9/11-don't you think? Keith analyzes it very nicely.
Olbermann: "Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda in the same sentence separated by seven words. Sept. 11th and Saddam Hussein -two sentences later, separated by six words. In a moment Craig Crawford joins me to discuss the fundamental remaining question. Who does the President think he's F'n kidding?
Video and Discussion
Comments:
<< Home
Besides the obvious comment... that he's a compulsive pathological liar, I'm wondering if you've seen the video several months ago (well, at least that's when I saw it) where they show him when he was Governor of Texas, giving speeches, and appearing to be an intelligent "take charge" leading man... and they compare those videos to today, as President, in which he stutters, and says things that make absolutely no sense (the humor section in the bookstores are full of "Bushisms")... and then they have professional behavioral doctors (I can't think of their titles or names at the moment) that state that George W. Bush is clearly showing signs of early stages of dementia. I wish I was kidding, but I'm not. And this man is leading our country (and attempting to lead every other f'ing country on the planet). Are you familiar with the video I'm referring to? If not, I can search for it, but it will take me a while, I'm sure. Thank you for the blog, as always. ~ Jo
Post a Comment
<< Home